![]() Thus, we need to check to see if there is any truth value for the variable involved whether or not it is possible that the premises end up being true and the conclusion being false. The necessarily / must element in the definition makes it so that we are not looking at whether the claims are in fact true but rather whether the forms of the claims are such that their truth implies the truth of the conclusion. ![]() ![]() And my answer is a less formal version of what Hunan is telling you.Īn argument is valid if having its premises be true necessarily leads to a true conclusion. Your question is basically the same as this one: What is the logical form of the definition of validity?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |